I did not learn to appreciate history until long after I
graduated from college. Since
then, I’ve developed a love of history.
While doing research for another article on this blog,
I learned a little about the history of Eugenics in the United Sates. What is Eugenics, you ask? Good question. Most people that I know have no idea
what it is either. Why was
Eugenics not taught in your U.S. History class? I can’t give a definitive answer, but I have a good
idea. Eugenics is a deep, dark
secret in American history, very close to the disastrous kidnapping,
relocation, and robbing of all their property, of Japanese Americans in World
War II. FDR did this without any
thought and most Americans accepted it without question. Back to Eugenics. If you type “Eugenics” in www.ask.com you will get this definition: “The
study of hereditary improvement of the human race by controlled selective
breeding.”
In the book, “Darwin Day in America” by John G. West,[i]
Chapter 7, is titled “Breeding Our Way out of Poverty.” This chapter thoroughly documents the
Eugenics movement in the United States.
I read with horror what transpired with Eugenics. This
movement took science by storm throughout America from 1890 to the 1960s. How could intelligent
men, such as Presidents Theodore Roosevelt
and Woodrow Wilson, The Rockefeller Foundation, Ralph Waldo Emerson and many
distinguished scientists such as Professor Edwin Conklin, a biology professor
at Princeton University, could believe and propagate such evil as was propagated
by the Eugenics movement?
Psychologist Henry Goddard introduced the term
“moron” into the English language. According to West Goddard was obsessed that “feeble-minded” Americans
were degrading the country’s racial stock. West describes the case of Deborah
Kallikak - In 1912 Goddard wrote a
book titled “The Kallikak Family:
A Study in Feeble-Mindedness.” The scientific community received the
book with great acclaim. Deborah
Kallikak was born to a single mother on welfare and was believed to be from a
line of what Goddard considered "feeble-minded" family members. Goddard studied the entire family tree
to prove his point. He determined
that the family tree was filled with what he called “defectives and
delinquents.”
Goddard went as far as the American Revolutionary War and found 480
descendants of which he found that 143 were feeble-minded. He did not specify how he came to that
conclusion. Deborah was in the
feeble-minded category, although all her teachers refused to consider her as
such. Convinced of his position
Goddard urged that the nation apply biological science to its social-welfare
policies. In Washington D.C. Dr.
Woods Hutchinson of the New York Polyclinic preached Eugenics at the annual
meeting of the American Public Health Association. Hutchinson proposed that all American children be given a
Eugenics inspection by their third year in school. As soon as a child was identified as feeble-minded he/she
would only receive training befitting such a child. Then they should be segregated in farm colonies or
sterilized.
Eugenics was promoted as a way to keep the race free of
“less than desirable traits.” What
is most galling is that a determination of such so-called feeble-mindedness was
a subjective decision, based on purely metaphysical criteria and not on any
scientific measurements that could be tested. Once a prominent scientist called you feeble-minded then you
were stuck with this label – totally arbitrary and capricious.
The Eugenics movement drew direct inspiration from Darwinian
biology, according to West, and later became known as “Social Darwinism.” Professor Edwin Conklin stated
“nevertheless a good many defectives survive in modern society and are capable
of reproduction who would have perished in more primitive society before
reaching maturity. Such defectives survive by charity and are allowed to
reproduce.” West points out that Eugenists seemed certain that once man took control of his own evolution, he
could do an even better job than nature.
Confident that modern biology had revealed to them how to breed a better
race, Eugenists set about putting their “scientific” ideas into action.
Eugenics had such a solid following that government started
passing laws to promote its agenda.
The first law was to limit marriage and immigration. Connecticut enacted the first Eugenics
marriage law in 1896. By 1914 more
than half of the states had imposed new restrictions on the marriage of persons
considered feeble-minded.
Immigration laws were also targeted by Eugenists, who believed that
biological defectiveness from foreign countries contributed to social welfare
programs. By 1920 Congress held
hearings on the “Biological Aspects of Immigration.” In 1924 Congress adopted a new immigration law, which curtailed
the number of immigrants allowed from southern and Eastern Europe. Although they did not specifically call
Southern and Eastern Europeans “feeble-minded,” the implication was clear. Now how they made the jump of including
Southern and Eastern Europeans with this category is unknown. As of 1956 when my Southern European
family immigrated to America from southern Italy, this immigration statute was
still in force.
Another good example of the horrors of Eugenics is the case
of Carrie Buck. Born to parents
who were considered feeble-minded, she was taken from her parents and placed in
a foster home at age four. By age
10 her mother was declared mentally defective and incarcerated in a Virginia
Colony for Epileptics and the feeble-minded. Carrie made the best of her circumstances; she performed
well in school, attended church and sang in the church choir. Then, in the summer of 1923, Carrie was
raped by the nephew of her foster parents and became pregnant. Her foster parents, wishing to keep
this a secret, had Carrie committed to the same Virginia Colony for the
feeble-minded her mother had been committed to. In 1924 the board of the Virginia Colony decided that Carrie
must be sterilized under Virginia’s sterilization law. Forced sterilizations swept the
country. By 1940 36,000 men and
women had been forcibly sterilized.
Half of these were done in California alone, Virginia followed with
4,000. All told, 36 states
performed forced serializations on those classified as feeble-minded.
Carrie Buck fought the sterilization order and lost. The case was eventually appealed to the
U.S. Supreme Court and became the case of Buck vs. Bell. The
Supreme Court also ruled against Carrie and she was forcibly sterilized. The Supreme Court voted 8 to 1 against
her. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
is noted for saying, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The only justice to vote for Carrie was
Justice Pierce Butler, a conservative Roman Catholic.
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, championed
the Eugenics movement. In a speech
at Vassar College Sanger spoke about the “ruinous costs to taxpayers for
defectives.” Sanger was an ardent Darwinist and considered blacks, Native
Americans, Jews and Hispanics
“lower classes” which must not be allowed to multiply. In 1939 she started “The N-gro” project
as a way to prevent the birth of too many blacks. Even today, if you look at where the Planned Parenthood
offices are, you will find most of them in lower class neighborhoods. The
method is abortion; the goal to prevent too many “undesirables.” I’m amazed at how this is totally
ignored by the “tolerant” political left who think that abortion is “a woman’s
right to choose.”
In the aftermath of the Eugenics movement, scholars pointed
out how shaky and fraudulent the diagnosis of “feeble-mindedness” was. Henry Goddard, who studied the Kallikak
family mentioned earlier, for example, hid the real identities of the Kallikak
family so no one could check his work.
One scholar, through great detective work, did finally discover the
identities of the Kallikak family and he conclusively showed that the
assessment was a product of prejudice.
Carrie Buck lived a very normal life; she was happily married for 25
years until the death of her husband.
She re-married and remained so until her death in 1983. By the time of her death she was no
longer considered “feeble-minded.”
Most Americans, although controversial, accepted the
Eugenics movement. Roman Catholics
provided the stiffest resistance.
Pope Pius XI strongly condemned Eugenics in a 1930 encyclical. Protestants such as William Jennings
Bryan and Billy Sunday also condemned and spoke out forcefully against
Eugenics.
Fast forward to the year 2009. We have a culture, which does not
consider the unborn as a human being and certainly not a person. The U.S. Supreme court said so in so
many words in Roe vs. Wade in 1973 and many liberal Americans believe it
still. How did Eugenics get such a
strong foothold in America? How
did the culture of death such as the “pro-choice” advocates get such a strong
foothold in America? These are questions that can be debated ad nauseam. How did otherwise intelligent people
fall for Eugenics? How do intelligent
people fall for “pro-choice” mentality?
Although I cannot point to definitive evidence for how Eugenics
influenced the “pro-choice” mentality.
I think it is not difficult to see the inference one to the other. The same fraudulent evidence for
Eugenics is evident in the “pro-choice” mentality.